Our partners
Through the Looking Glass
Libraries full of hate: from Azerbaijan to Georgia
Author: Rahim Shaliyev
Azerbaijan has been supplying Georgian libraries with books containing hate speech against Armenians. While the libraries don’t see them as a problem, some Azerbaijani Georgians fear they might help plant the seeds of ethnic tension.
When Imran Gafarov, an Azerbaijani Georgian, came across a book full of territorial claims and hate speech against Armenians at the public library in Marneuli, an Azerbaijani-majority city in southern Georgia’s Kvemo Kartli region, he was in a state of disbelief.
‘When I visited the Marneuli library, I saw a book called Western Azerbaijan’s Monuments, written by Aziz Alakbarli. I thought the book would be about the historical monuments located in the west of Azerbaijan. However, as I read the book, it became clear that the book was about monuments situated in the territory of Armenia. The book contained an element of hostility towards Armenians’, Gafarov told OC Media.
There are two copies of the book in the library. On the 13th page of the 2006 edition, there are territorial claims made against Armenia. On the 21st page, the writer claims that Armenians committed genocide against Azerbaijanis on four occasions. The 2007 edition contains a map of ‘Western Azerbaijan’ in which locations situated in Armenia are written in their Azerbaijani variants.
The library contains other propagandistic material, which can be divided into three types: hate speech directed at Armenia and Armenians, support for separatist and territorial claims against Iran, and propaganda on behalf of the ruling Aliyev family.
Openly hateful rhetoric
In Georgian-Azerbaijani Lands, the author, Eldaniz Ibrahimov, does not clearly state his aim, but a subtle message pushing Georgian Azerbaijanis to independence is evident. Though the book is supposedly about Azerbaijan’s monuments, it starts with a 1918 speech made by then–Chairman of the Parliament of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Alimardan Topchubashov:
‘There is nothing as elastic and mutable as politics. Our hopes of living in a period of freedom and independence are being reified. We never lost our hope. We have always believed that our people can live freely and that we would do anything to gain independence. We have never given up on this worthy endeavour and we never will, as we recognise nothing that is greater than this fortune’.
On the ninth page of the book, the author states the following: ‘Some interesting pieces of research are being published on occasion about the Azerbaijanis of Georgia. Their lives, problems, and situation are pertinent topics for the Azerbaijani media. Mass media, including websites, dedicate a special place to the topic of Azerbaijanis living in Georgia. However, this does not suffice. Our fingers should consistently be placed on the pulse of Borchali [historic name for parts of Kvemo Kartli] as this region holds special importance for us’.
These sections of the book have not been included in the Russian and English translations.
In the same library, the fourth volume of Armenians and Facts contains extreme hate speech on more or less every page. On page 1,925, Armenians are described as ‘gypsies’ and ‘slaves’:
‘Armenians are newcomers to Turkey and the Caucasus and have found perfectly habitable lands. They have taken advantage of the hospitality of Turkic peoples and have decided to settle here for good. Nevertheless, they have not been able to rid themselves of their gypsy ways and have become the political puppets of powerful states. They have become the eternal enemies of the overlords whose subjects they used to be’.
Pages 1,942 and 1,943 are filled with openly hateful rhetoric:
‘The time will come when Armenians will be cursed by humankind and remembered by scholars, travellers, and historical figures as a two-faced, mischievous, immoral, villainous tribe that distorts history, changing the names of monuments, historical sites and places belonging to Turks, making them Armenian’.
‘Simply an archive’
Such books are not only available in Marneuli.
In February 2009, Azerbaijani newspaper 525-ji Gazet reported that Azerbaijan’s Ministry of Culture and Tourism had sent a substantial number of books to the Library of Georgia’s National Parliament, the Tbilisi State University, the Azerbaijani Cultural Centre, and Azerbaijani libraries, among other institutions.
‘These books and films are on the topics of Azerbaijan’s rich culture, history, literature and art, its contemporary foreign policy, the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Armenian and Azerbaijan, national leader Heydar Aliyev, President Ilham Aliyev, and Azerbaijan’s First Lady Mehriban Aliyeva’.
According to 525-ji Gazet, the collection of books sent included Heydar Aliyev and Culture, The Protector of Our Culture and Cultural Gems, Ali Eyvazov’s Humanism and Charity Mission, and Armenian Terrorism, among others.
In December 2009, RFE/RL’s Azerbaijani-language service, Radio Azaldig reported that the National Library had sent 3,488 books to Georgia. These books were distributed to educational institutions and libraries.
One of the books sent to the National Parliamentary Library of Georgia was Akif Naghi’s The Karabakh Conflict — A Short History. According to its preamble, the book ‘presents facts about the Armenians’ character, aggressiveness, and expansionism against the Azerbaijani people from the distant past’. From the first page to the very last, the book is rich with insults directed at the Armenian people.
There are also a substantial number of books with content supporting separatist claims against Iran, such as works by poet Khalil Rza Uluturk. Most of these propagandistic books were published on the order of Azerbaijan’s Ministry of Culture and Tourism.
Lana Khashalashvili, the director of the library, told OC Media that she was unaware of the presence of hate speech in the books.
‘When the library just opened, the Embassy of Azerbaijan gifted it 800 books in the Azerbaijani language. We don’t have the authority to check these books as we view the library as an archive. We do not have the power to take out any books from the list’.
The library also contains books that glorify the ruling family in Azerbaijan.
According to the library’s director, Levan Taktakishvili, all books are treated equally and the library is regarded simply as an archive.
‘It’s not right to collectively demonise innocent people’
Though Ahmad Imamguliyev, an ethnic Azerbaijani who is a part of the opposition European Georgia Party, has not read the books, he told OC Media that the use of hate speech against certain peoples was unacceptable.
‘It’s normal to give an aggressive response to the dirty politics of any state. However, it’s not right to collectively demonise innocent people. Rude epithets directed at national groups is unacceptable. For example, we can say that the Russian state is an aggressor, but we have no right to use such epithets for the Russian people’.
However, Imamguliyev does not believe that such books cause hate among ethnic minorities living in Georgia. According to him, such books are not read by many people. He adds that ethnic minorities living in Georgia have always had amicable relations.
‘The Georgian state should prevent such books from being brought to Georgia’
Aida Taghiyeva, an ethnically Azerbaijani social activist from Georgia, believes that books containing hate should be removed from libraries.
‘It’s simply wrong to refer to a people as “base” or “two-faced”. The Georgian state should prevent such books from being brought to Georgia’, she told OC Media.
According to her, such books have a ‘psychological effect’ on local Azerbaijanis living in Georgia.
‘As a result of the pressure exerted by Azerbaijan, around 80% of Georgian Azerbaijanis now hold a certain amount of hate for Armenians. Although this is not evident on the surface, it is felt in certain contexts. Such books reinforce this pressure’, Taghiyeva said.
She also asserted that this pressure forms part of Azerbaijan’s politics.
‘The Azerbaijani government sees us as a part of them. Georgian Azerbaijanis filled with hate for Armenians are useful for them. If a conflict arises here, they would use them for their own benefit’, she said. She added, however, that Georgia understands that Azerbaijan suffered heavily during the war.
‘We regret that and we have always condemned the genocide in Khojali. Nevertheless, justice is not born out of hate. This does not mean that we should be enemies with the Armenians in Georgia. Innocent people who lived at a time of war should not be targetted. Those living in Georgia, in large part, did not participate in the conflict. These issues should not be solved by us, but between states’.
